Legal Opinion

McPeek v. Shafer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1935No. Appeal, 288PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This was an action on a parol contract brought by Frederick McPeek, a sub-contractor, against Howard Shafer, the general contractor.

In the Spring of 1929, Howard Shafer was awarded the contract by the State Highway Department to construct the highway on the State Road from Durham Furnace to Springtown in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. On account of the time limit contained in this contract, Shafer was desirous of sub-letting the building of a concrete bridge, a culvert, and the concrete headwalls on the line of the improved highway which he had contracted to build.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Mix v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Dravo Contracting Co. v. James Rees & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZlatovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. PetermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. FontaineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Gingrich v. DissingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API