Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fontaine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1956No. Appeals, 175, 176, and 177PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an appeal from the conviction and denial of a motion for a new trial by the court of Oyer and Terminer and Quarter Sessions of Delaware County.

Appellant, Herman Fontaine, was found guilty by a jury on three bills of indictment charging him with setting up a gambling establishment and procuring and enticing persons to gamble, keeping a disorderly house and selling liquor without a license. Appellant was tried on the above indictments on June 13 and 14, 1955, and the jury returned verdicts of guilty against appellant and Albert Layton. Thereafter, a new trial was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Cunningham v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  4. McPeek v. ShaferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. TolassiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. PetermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API