Thomas v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
LEFKOW, District Judge.
Defendant City of Chicago (“the City”) presently moves to dismiss plaintiffs amended four count pro se complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, strike counts II through IV pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 12(f). For the reasons articulated below, the court dismisses counts III and IV and denies the City’s motion for counts I and II.
STANDARDS
A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) challenges the sufficiency of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stevens v. Hollywood Towers & Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Neita v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019