Legal Opinion

Thomas v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 30, 2001No. 99 C 4689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

LEFKOW, District Judge.

Defendant City of Chicago (“the City”) presently moves to dismiss plaintiffs amended four count pro se complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, strike counts II through IV pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 12(f). For the reasons articulated below, the court dismisses counts III and IV and denies the City’s motion for counts I and II.

STANDARDS

A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) challenges the sufficiency of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Hollywood Towers & Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Neita v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API