Legal Opinion

Cuneo v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

In January, 1921, the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant Langone an automobile, under an agreement of conditional sale, by which title was not to pass to Langone until eleven promissory notes, payable monthly, were paid. The agreement provided that the failure to pay any one note when due terminated Langone’s right to the possession of the automobile. The last four notes, due August 7, 1921, September 7, 1921, October 7,1921, and November 7,1921, were not paid at maturity. The automobile was duly registered in the name of Langone as owner. It was damaged in an accident, late in November,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunbar-Laporte Motor Co. v. DesrocherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North End Auto Park, Inc. v. PETRINGA TRUCKING CO. INCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. HindeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Associated Finance of Boston, Inc. v. Hub Motor Car Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Watertown Auto Service, Inc. v. KellyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API