Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hinde

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of replevin brought in the District Court of Somerville against the defendant, doing "business as F. A. Hinde and Sons.

The following recitals are contained in a report of the trial judge on the merits to the Appellate Division: “the plaintiff corporation sold the goods (furniture) involved to one Gazlay in September, 1932, on a contract of conditional sale and delivered the goods to Gazlay; the defendant was and is a public warehouseman; on May 31, 1934, *111Gazlay stored the goods with the defendant at her storage warehouse . . . under a storage contract; at the time of said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Cuneo v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Blackstone Nursing Home, Inc. v. P & H Leasing Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. StoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API