Legal Opinion

Dunbar-Laporte Motor Co. v. Desrocher

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of replevin. The plaintiff, a company dealing in automobiles, sold to one Viellioux an automobile in accordance with a written contract, which recited that the purchaser had paid $250 at the time of sale, and given ten promissory notes to become due by their terms on different dates; the-title to the automobile was to remain *294in the plaintiff until all the notes and any renewals thereof were paid. The contract contained other provisions, which need not be referred to at this time; it was dated August 28, 1920. The defendant testified that Viellioux left the car at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wylie v. MarinofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Guaranty Security Corp. v. BrophyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Field v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. D'Arcy v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Fisher v. AlstenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loring v. Commissioner of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. North End Auto Park, Inc. v. PETRINGA TRUCKING CO. INCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Sheehan & Egan, Inc. v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Cuneo v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. MCS Enterprises, Ltd. v. HenryMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API