Legal Opinion

Cities Service Co. v. McDowell

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 18, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

I shall first dispose of the questions raised ■ by the demurrer, and then dispose of the motion to modify the restraining order.

Demurrer.

1. The first objection to be considered under the demurrer has to do with the securities in the hands of the defendants, Horace H. McDowell, Caroline H. McDowell and Dorothy M. Child. With respect to a portion of these securities, the bill avers that they were wrongfully acquired by Jesse C. McDowell with the funds of complainant obtained by him in breach of his trust as confidential agentr and it seeks to follow them in the hands of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Draper v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  3. Skinner v. Educational Pictures Securities Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Hem Research, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1989
  5. Union Chemical & Materials Corp. v. CannonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API