Legal Opinion
United States v. Hurst
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2003No. 01-7057PublishedCited by 249 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Jerry D. Hurst, a federal prisoner, seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, challenging the validity of a judgment and sentence entered upon his guilty plea. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that it was filed one day too late to comply with the one-year limitations period applicable to § 2255 motions. This court granted a certificate of appeala-bility under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), limited to the procedural issue of whether the limitations period had expired at the time Mr. Hurst submitted his motion to district court, and directed briefing on that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Miller v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- James C. Flanagan v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by249 opinions
- Hernandez v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Harris v. DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Downs v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.