Legal Opinion
Harris v. Dinwiddie
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2011No. 10-5144PublishedCited by 232 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the nearly ubiquitous claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and complaints about evidentiary rulings. Chad Nathan Harris, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se 1 and in forma pauperis (ifp ), 2 wants to appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The district court concluded he had not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). As that decision is not reasonably debatable, we deny his request for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- Stuart v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Edwards v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Gayton v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Neiberger v. RudekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Brown v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.