People v. Miller

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

We accept as a proper statement of the one problem presented by this appeal that which is expressed in defendant-appellant Miller’s closing brief in these words: “The only question in this ease as appellant sees it, is the question as to the sufficiency of the corrobora tion of the testimony of the accomplice Jacoby.” The answer which we are giving to this question is that the corroboration is sufficient, amply so.

The appellant was charged with having committed the crime of robbery. The evidence that a robbery took place, in which some $70,000 worth of furs were stolen, is…