Legal Opinion

Martell v. L.D.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2003No. 20030305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] L.D. appealed a district court order requiring him to undergo treatment for chemical dependence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] L.D.’s mother (“Petitioner”) petitioned the district court to have L.D. involuntarily treated because he was chemically dependent and posed a serious risk of harm to himself. The petition stated L.D. had previously been in treatment for alcohol abuse, had been drinking daily to intoxication, and had not been taking his medication for diabetes and Wernicke’s Syndrome. Petitioner was worried L.D. would “die or go into a diabetic coma” without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Interest of KJLNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In the Interest of M.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krine v. W.J.C.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Weisenburger v. R.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Balf-Soran v. L.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re LDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DeFriesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API