Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Sweeney
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 10, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 352 (1951)
78 A.2d 313
LEO COLEMAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RUTH ELLEN COLEMAN DIJOLES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARRY SWEENEY, ET UX., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided January 10, 1951.
Mr. William Hermann, attorney for the plaintiff.
Mr. Edward W. Eichmann, attorney for the defendants.
Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey.
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
This is a suit for the foreclosure of a tax sale certificate.
Fred Coleman, plaintiff's father, purchased the tax sale certificate from the Borough of Lawnside, New Jersey, on March…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nelson v. NaumowiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Hodgkins v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Forster v. DavenportNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Diamonde v. Berkeley TownshipNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- American Can Co. v. Dornoil Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gunther & Shirley Co. v. Presbytery of Los AngelesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Jackson Tanker Corp. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc. (In Re Jackson Tanker Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Stouter v. BaileyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988