Legal Opinion
Stouter v. Bailey
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 5, 1988No. 430PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, Judge.
Pursuant to Md. Rule 1029,1 Doris Stouter (Stouter) brings this expedited appeal from the Order of the Circuit Court for Frederick County which fixed the amount required for James Bailey (Bailey) to exercise his right of redemption regarding his 96-acre tract of property purchased at a tax sale by Stouter. Stouter asks whether under Section 14-845(b) of the MD TAX-PROP. CODE ANN. (1986, 1987 Cum.Supp.), she is entitled to be compensated by Bailey for the value of improvements she made to the property after the date she was served with a copy of Bailey’s motion to set aside her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- M'iver, Lessees v. RaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Bradshaw v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Associated Estates, LLC v. CaldwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001