Legal Opinion

Bryson v. MacY

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 2009No. CIV-05-1150-FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.

Before the court are Defendant City of Oklahoma City’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 8, 2009 (doc. no. 105), Defendant Robert H. Macy’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 9, 2009 (doc. no. 107), and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant, Joyce Gilchrist, filed January 9, 2009 (doc. no. 110). Upon due consideration of the parties’ submissions, the court makes its determination.

I. Background

Plaintiff, David Bryson, spent over 17 years in prison for crimes — kidnaping, rape and sodomy — that he did not commit. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. HensleyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  2. Buchhorn v. Douglas County, Kansas, Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API