Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Marcano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 11, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a part-time truck driver helper after he refused a route assignment with a new driver. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that claimant was disqualified from receiving *796benefits on the ground that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Notwithstanding claimant’s exculpatory explanation for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AttaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MercureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API