Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1981No. CC80-290 CA 19272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, assigning as error, first, the court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, and, second, the court’s consideration, in imposing sentence, of defendant’s decision to stand trial rather than enter a plea.

As to the suppression issue we have considered only the facts presented at the suppression hearing. Without detailing those facts here, we conclude defendant’s consent to search was voluntary, and, therefore, the court’s denial of the motion was proper. State v. Kennedy, 290 Or 493, 506, 624 P2d 99 (1981).

De…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. United States v. Leroy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. QualeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. FitzgibbonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. SandeferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. Hernandez-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API