Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzgibbon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1992No. 440229; CA A70491PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant was convicted on two counts of harassment. ORS 166.065. He appeals, asking that his convictions be reversed or, in the alternative, that the sentence imposed be vacated and the case be remanded for resentencing.

Seven of defendant’s assignments of error are without merit. We limit our discussion to the sixth assignment, on which we remand for resentencing.

In that assignment, defendant argues that the trial judge punished him for exercising his right to stand trial. Defendant claims that the trial judge was considerably more harsh in sentencing him after the trial than she would have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. QualeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. Randy HughsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API