Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Winkle Terra-Cotta Co. v. Cotteral

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by the people of the State of Michigan, for the use and benefit of the Winkle Terra-Cotta Company, against Joseph W. Cotteral, Sr., and Joseph W. Cotteral, Jr., copartners, as principals, and Charles E. Bresler and John E. Calnon as sureties, upon a statutory bond. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In March, 1895, Cotteral & Co. contracted to build the Central High School Building in Detroit. The usual bond given in cases of contracts for the construction of municipal buildings was given by Cotteral & Co. It is claimed the other defendants are sureties upon the bond. The plaintiff furnished the terra-cotta work in the building under a contract made with Cotteral & Co. The contractors failed before the building was completed. The Terra-Cotta Company was not paid for the work which had been furnished by it at the time of the failure, and it brought this suit to- recover upon the bond. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Enos v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Friedman v. County of HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Buhl Sons Co. v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People ex rel. Davis v. CampfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Horton v. Crowley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API