People ex rel. Buhl Sons Co. v. Finn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by the people of the State of Michigan, for the use and benefit of Buhl Sons’ Company, against John Finn, principal, and John M. Spaulding and Michael Finn, sureties, on a statutory bond. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Defendant John Finn was a building contractor, who on August 16, 1906, entered into a con*482tract with the fire commission of the city of Detroit to build engine house No. 29, according to plans and specifications furnished by Donaldson & Meier, architects, and to their satisfaction, for the sum of $19,970.85. The other defendants were sureties upon a bond given by Finn as provided by Act No. 187, Pub. Acts of 1905, entitled :
“ An act to insure the payment of subcontractors and wages earned and materials used in constructing, repairing or ornamenting public buildings and public works.”
George…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Avery v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People ex rel. Winkle Terra-Cotta Co. v. CotteralMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- People ex rel. Davis v. CampfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- People ex rel. Reynolds v. BanhagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- People ex rel. Kuenzel v. National Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- O'Neal Steel Company v. Leon C. Miles, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- People ex rel. Sauer v. ConnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- People Ex Rel. Towner Hardware Co. v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.