Legal Opinion

Enos v. Sutherland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1863PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal in chancery from Berrien Circuit. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Complainant as administrator of the estate of Joseph Enos, deceased, filed his bill to redeem certain premises from an alleged mortgage, given by his intestate to defendants as partnei'S under the name of- J. E. Sutherland & Co. The bill alleged that Joseph Enos made an absolute deed to defendants, who gave him back a defeasance of the following tenor:

“Bond of J. E. Sutherland & Co., to Joseph Enos. The conditions of this bond are as follows: That whereas, said Joseph Enos is indebted on settlement to J. E. Sutherland & Co., at this date, the amount of two hundred and seventy…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Reh v. ErtrachterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Griffith v. RudisillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API