Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Afriat v. Afriat

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1941No. 3346PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR ALLOWANCES. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

OPINION

Appellant asks this Court to make certain allowances to permit her to prosecute an appeal from a judgment rendered in the First Judicial District Court, in and for Ormsby County. Respondent has moved to strike the motion and has also urged certain objections to its consideration.

1. The practice of moving to strike a motion is not favored. 42 C.J. p. 517, Buehler v. Buehler, 38 Nev. 500, at page 503,151 P. 44; Orleans Hornsilver…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kondas v. Washoe County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Buehler v. BuehlerNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Orleans Hornsilver Mining Co. v. Le Champ D'Or French Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. ShortNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Keeler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Benson v. BensonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. McVay v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API