Legal Opinion

United States v. Dayton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2011No. 09-5022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Christopher Adam Dayton brings a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge to his convictions for distributing and possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (a)(4)(B). Mr. Dayton does not dispute that he distributed and possessed child pornography. Rather, Mr. Dayton argues that, because the government did not offer evidence that the images and videos charged in the indictment had traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, the government failed to offer sufficient proof of the requisite…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API