Legal Opinion
United States v. Sturm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 24, 2012No. 19-4118PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Appellant Christopher Adam Dayton was convicted of distributing and possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (a)(4)(B). Appellant Kenneth Dean Sturm was convicted of receiving and possessing child pornography, in violation ' of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(B) and (a)(5)(B). Both Defendants argue the Government cannot prove the interstate commerce element of the crimes charged unless it presents evidence the specific digital images they possessed, received, and/or distributed traveled in interstate or foreign commerce. We conclude…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Yeley-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Gama-BastidasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. David RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. KiefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DeChristopherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.