Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Circle T Express

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1995No. CA 94-557PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The appellant appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Circle T Express and the Second Injury Fund were not precluded from raising the issue of compensability and that the appellant failed to prove that he sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. On appeal, the appellant argues that the Commission erred in allowing the appellees to raise the issue of compensability after the issue had been stipulated to in a pre-hearing order and benefits had been paid and that there is no substantial evidence to support…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Grimes v. North American FoundryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. State, Second Injury Fund v. Mid-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lay v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Democrat Printing and LithographCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Weld Rite, Inc. v. DunganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Ark. Dep't of Corr. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API