Legal Opinion

Reed v. Farmers Insurance Group

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 10, 1997No. 3-96-0739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

The plaintiff, Julie Reed, filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Farmers Insurance Group. The first count sought to have a clause in her insurance policy issued by defendant declared void as against public policy and section 143a of the Insurance Code mandating the presence of such clause in her policy declared unconstitutional. 215 ILCS 5/143a (West 1996). In the second count of her complaint, plaintiff sought to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of the negligent driving of an uninsured motorist. Defendant moved to dismiss both counts. The trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. First of America Bank, Rockford, N.A. v. NetschIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Messenger v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. LindnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. Farmers Insurance GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Parker v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Brooks v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CAS. COMPANIESAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Brooks v. Cigna Property & Casualty CompaniesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Parker v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API