State, Helena Adjustment Company v. Dist. Ct. of Lewis
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUBIAM.
The application for an alternative writ •of prohibition is denied. The notice of appeal, while not ■commended as a model, is not so defective as to fail to give the district court jurisdiction. It directed the attention of the adverse party to the fact that the judgment will be the subject of review in the appellate court. (State ex rel. Rosenstein v. District Court, 41 Mont. 100, 21 Ann. Cas. 1307, 108 Pac. 580. And see In re Day, 18 Wash. 359, 51 Pac. 474.)
The weight of authority is that a statute providing that an attorney shall not become surety for his client is merely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Stephens v. KeasterMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Krause v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Rosenstein v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Morin v. WellsMontana Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Fallon CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Stark v. Heart River Irrigation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.