United States v. Beebee
United States Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
McCkaky, Circuit Judge.
The demurrer raises, for, the first time in a Federal Court, the important question whether any lapse of time will constitute a bar, or a sufficient defense, to a suit in equity, brought in the name of the United States.
This suit is brought to cancel and set aside certain' land patents executed by the United States, on the ground that the same were obtained by fraud. The patents attacked as fraudulent were issued about forty-three years before the filing of the bill, and many of the alleged matters of fact, concerning…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Aetna Ins. v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Pond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Shooters Island Shipyard Co. v. Standard Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Dardenne v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.