Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was brought in the Genesee circuit court by plaintiff to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by him by being put off defendant’s freight train, just east of the city of Flint, on September 3, 1887. On the tzúal the plaintiff recovered judgment for §100. Defendazit brings error.

Plaintiff’s claim in his declaration is that on September 3, 1887, about half-past 10 o’clock in the foz’enoon, he purchased from the authorized agent of said defendant at Flint, and paid the price demanded therefoz*, a ticket called a “ Week’s-end ’’ return ticket, which by its terms entitled him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Marshall v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. B. & M. R. R. v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Keen v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gardner v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Brown v. Rapid Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Richmond v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API