Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Action for damages by F. L. Richmond against the Southern Pacific Company, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury. The facts are that plaintiff, having secured from the defendant a 3,000-mile passenger ticket over certain parts of its lines of railway, at 2V2 cents a mile, subscribed his name to the following stipulation, among others, indorsed thereon, to wit: “When used upon any freight train designated to carry passengers, the Southern Pacific Co. is absolved from all liability as a common carrier for loss of life, personal injury, or loss or damage of baggage or property of the party so using this ticket.” The plaintiff, while riding as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Bates v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. KeeferIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Forepaugh v. Del. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Burnett v. RiterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phoenix Railway Co. v. Grant Brothers Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API