Legal Opinion

Bridges v. City of Richardson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1962No. A-8682PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported in 349 S.W. 2d 644.

We approve the judgment entered by the Court of Civil Appeals, but we are not satisfied that the opinion of the court “in all respects has correctly declared the law”. Normally that conclusion would call for no other action on our part than the stamping of the application for writ of error, “Refused. No Reversible Error”. See Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. But some of the general holdings of the Court of Civil Appeals, express and implied, which we regard as erroneous are so far-reaching that we deem it wise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bridges v. City of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  4. Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API