Legal Opinion

United States v. Palmer

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 22, 1994No. NMCM 94 01261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Judge:

In this appeal, the appellant argues that his guilty plea to violating a provision of U.S. Navy Regulations by wrongfully possessing a dangerous weapon, a .25 caliber handgun, on a naval station was improvidently entered because the gun was unloaded and is therefore not a dangerous weapon. After examining the record of trial, the briefs of the parties, the regulation concerned and pertinent cases, we hold that an unloaded handgun is a dangerous weapon for purposes of alleged violations of U.S. Navy Regulations charged under Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ],…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. VegaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. SullivanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  2. United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. DavisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. TurnerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API