Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Turner

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 8, 1995No. ARMY 9302185Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnston, Judge

That portion of the majority opinion concerning the assaults in this case has at least

four flaws. The first and perhaps the most serious flaw in the majority approach is that it leads to bizarre results. For example, if an accused approached his victim with an unloaded pistol concealed in his pocket, he could subject himself to a felony conviction and the maximum punishment of a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for one year for carrying a concealed dangerous weapon.1 If an accused approached the same victim with an unloaded pistol and pointed it as if to fire, the result under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API