Legal Opinion

Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Co. v. United States, Interstate Commerce Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1924No. 330PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

The main question in this case is whether the so-called “ recapture ” paragraphs of the Transportation Act of 1920, c. 91, § 422, § 15a, paragraphs 5-17, 41 Stat. 456, 489-491, are constitutional.

The Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Company is a corporation of'Texas, engaged in intrastate, interstate and foreign commerce. Its volume of intrastate traffic exceeds that of its interstate and foreign traffic. ■ In response to orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, the carrier made returns for ten months of 1920, and for the full year of 1921, reporting the value of its railroad property employed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API