United States v. Sanford, Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Depose Unavailable Witnesses, ECF No. 70, which requests the Court to authorize, pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 15(a)(1), the pre-trial depositions of five witnesses who are allegedly unavailable to testify at trial. The defendants requested expedited consideration of this motion since three of the witnesses they seek to depose are employed aboard the F/V San Nikunau, a fishing vessel that will depart from New Zealand for *3deep sea fishing in the third week of April. After this ship departs New…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Ismaili, Lakbir Moulay. Appeal of Lakbir Moulay IsmailiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Sanford, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- State of Iowa v. Zachariah J. RogersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- State v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- Casey v. Wright Medical Technology IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.