Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanford, Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 14, 2012No. Criminal Case No. 11-cr-352 (BAH)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss Counts One through Five of the Superseding Indictment filed by defendants Sanford, Ltd. and James Pogue. The defendants are charged in seven counts with violating federal laws when they allegedly discharged oil-contaminated sludge and bilge waste into the ocean. They now move to dismiss Counts One, Two and Four of the Superseding Indictment for failure to state a claim and inadequate notice, ECF No. 71; and to dismiss Counts Three and Five on grounds that these counts are duplicitous. ECF No. 64.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. HillieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. United States v. HillieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. HanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. United States v. Diana Shipping Services, S.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  5. United States v. TajideenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API