Legal Opinion
State Savings Bank v. Montgomery
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Assumpsit by the State Savings Bank of Ionia against Alexander T. Montgomery on certain promissory notes. Erom a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff sued defendant to recover the amount due on two notes reading as follows:
“$1,500.00. Ionia, Mich., Nov. 20th, 1897.
“Nin'ety days after date I promise to pay to the order of State Savings Bank of Ionia, Michigan, fifteen hundred and 00-100 dollars, at the State Savings Bank of Ionia, Michigan, with 7 per cent, interest after date. Value received.
“A. T. Montgomery.”
“$1,000.00. Ionia, Mich., Nov. 20th, 1897.
“Ninety days after date I promise to pay to the order of State Savings Bank of Ionia, Michigan, one thousand and 00-100 dollars, at the State Savings Bank of Ionia, Michigan,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Frenkel v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- McCarty v. KepretaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Watt v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1917
- Marquette County Savings Bank v. KoivistoMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- National Turners Building & Loan Ass'n v. SchreitmuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.