Legal Opinion
Kitts v. Menards, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 28, 2007No. 3:06-cv-708PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RUDY LOZANO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or Compel Arbitration and Stay Action (D.E.#4) filed by Menards, Inc., on December 7, 2006. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRANTED. The parties shall proceed with arbitration as provided by their agreement. All proceedings are STAYED pending further order of the Court. The Clerk is ORDERED to close the case, subject to the right of either party to seek relief from the stay.
The plaintiff, Bruce Kitts (“Plaintiff’), filed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Landis v. Pinnacle Eye Care, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Haligowski v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Giddings v. Media Lodge, Inc.United States District Court · 2018
- Coleman v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
- Giddings v. Media Lodge, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.