Legal Opinion
Bransted v. Schmidt
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 15, 1971No. 70-C-283PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This is a civil action for damages and injunctive relief. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that on April 1, 1969, his parole was revoked without being preceded by a constitutionally valid hearing; that he was taken into custody on October 1, 1969; that he was confined in jail from October 1, 1969, to June 9, 1970, when he pleaded guilty to certain charges; that the period between October 1, 1969, and June 9, 1970, did not count against the sentence from which he had been paroled; and that the June 9, 1970, proceedings conducted before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anglin v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sillman v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Anglin v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1979