Legal Opinion

In re Oryell

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to a search warrant issued by a United States Commissioner, the searching officer, a customs inspector, entered the private home of petitioner and seized 128 eases of- liquors of various kinds, the containers eon-eededly being labeled, “Liquor Control Board of Ontario” — a liquor board that was established in Ontario about April 5, 1927, more than eight years after the passage of the Yolstead Act. The search warrant, after its execution, and after seizure of the contraband, was traversed, and the same commissioner who issued the warrant, held it to have been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. United States v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating LiquorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nueslein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Leonard Hall, Jr. v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. One OX-5 American Eagle AirplaneDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
  5. United States v. One Quart Bottle of Alleged WhiskyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API