Legal Opinion
Blew v. Conner
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 12, 1959No. 46898Published
1Opinion of the Court
328 S.W.2d 626 (1959)
Elmo BLEW, Appellant,
v.
Albert F. CONNER and Mary W. Conner, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondents.
No. 46898.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
October 12, 1959.
Rehearing Denied November 9, 1959.
Hess & Collins, Macon, for appellant.
James Glenn, Macon, for respondents Albert F. Conner and Mary W. Conner.
John S. Marsalek, Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel & Hamilton, St. Louis, for respondent Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
WESTHUES, Judge.
This case, coming to the writer on reassignment, grew out of an occurrence on August 5, 1953, when…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palle v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Elsas v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- McFall v. Barton-Mansfield Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.