Legal Opinion

CellMark, Inc. v. Robert Webster, et al.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided May 26, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00181Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION at Covington CELLMARK, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, )Civil Action No. 2:24-cv-00181-SCM-CJS ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT WEBSTER, et al., ) AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiff CellMark, Inc. retained an expert, Jay Cunningham, to show that it suffered various economic damages arising from its claims in this case, and the Defendants retained two rebuttal experts, Joshua Shilts and Robert Kester. Now CellMark moves to exclude certain testimony from the Defendants’ rebuttal experts, [Dkt. 140, 142], arguing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. James Nelson, (Each and Every in This Class Action Suit) v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company El Paso Tennessee Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Paula Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API