Legal Opinion

EQUIPTO DIV. AURORA EQUIP. v. Yarmouth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1998No. 64863-8, 65053-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

950 P.2d 451 (1998)

134 Wash.2d 356

EQUIPTO DIVISION AURORA EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Respondent,

v.

Jerry YARMOUTH, d/b/a J & R Interiors, Inc., Petitioner.

DRAPER SHADE & SCREEN COMPANY, INC., Respondent,

v.

Jerry YARMOUTH, and his wife, "Jane Doe" Yarmouth, and the marital community thereof, d/b/a J & R Interiors, Inc., Appellants.

Nos. 64863-8, 65053-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 23, 1997.

Decided February 5, 1998.

Ross Taylor, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Breskin & Robbins, Arnold B. Robbins, Seattle, Joe Quaintance, Tacoma, for Respondents.

DOLLIVER, Justice.

Petitioner Jerry Yarmouth…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hall v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API