Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. CR00094B, A115328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

pro tempore

Defendant appeals her conviction for first-degree theft. ORS 164.055. We previously affirmed the conviction without opinion. State v. Watson, 190 Or App 305, 79 P3d 418 (2003). The Supreme Court thereafter vacated our decision and remanded for farther consideration in light of State v. Cox, 336 Or 284, 82 P3d 619 (2003). State v. Watson, 336 Or 376, 84 P3d 1080 (2004). In light of Cox, we vacate the conviction and remand the case to the trial court to determine the relevant facts and to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant and her husband engaged in a number of thefts at antique…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FujimotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API