Legal Opinion

State v. Fujimoto

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2014No. C112098CR; A151014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendant, who was convicted on one count of organized retail theft, ORS 164.098, and nine counts of first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, challenges his conviction on the organized retail theft count, as well as the trial court’s failure to merge the first-degree theft convictions into the organized retail theft conviction. We reject without discussion defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the organized retail theft charge. With respect to merger, as explained below, we reverse and remand with instructions to merge the guilty verdicts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GensitskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. BreshearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. PayeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API