State v. . Tisdale
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceWalker, J.
J., dissenting. It is unnecessary to consider any of the exceptions taken by the defendant on the trial, as his exception to the bill of indictment is well taken, and the motion to arrest the judgment must be allowed. The first count charges the unlawful sale of liquor, without a license, to some person to the jurors unknown, in violation of the general law. The second count charges the unlawful sale to some person to the jurors unknown, within territory wherein the sale of liquor is wholly prohibited by law. The third count is as follows: "The jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . StameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. . PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.