Legal Opinion
Case Handyman and Remodeling Services, LLC v. Schuele
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 31, 2008No. 2134 September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAEFF, Judge.
Appellants, Case Handyman and Remodeling Services, LLC, and Case Design/Remodeling, Inc. (collectively, “Case Handyman”), appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County denying their motion to compel arbitration with appellees, Judith and Albert Schuele (“the Schueles”). On appeal, Case Handyman presents the following two issues for our review, which we have reworded and reorganized as follows:
1. Did the circuit court err in denying the motion to compel arbitration where the Schueles are suing Case Handyman in connection with a contract containing a mandatory…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schuele v. Case Handyman & Remodeling Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Thompson v. WitherspoonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Griggs v. EvansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Schneider Electric Buildings Critical Systems, Inc. v. Western Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Schneider Elect. Build. Critical Systems v. Western Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.