Legal Opinion
D'Ercole Sales, Inc. v. Fruehauf Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 21, 1985PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
206 N.J. Super. 11 (1985)
501 A.2d 990
D'ERCOLE SALES, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
FRUEHAUF CORPORATION, ALSO KNOWN AS FRUEHAUF DISTRIBUTING COMPANY AND FRUEHAUF TRAILER COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, BEYER BROTHERS GMC CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 3, 1985.
Decided November 21, 1985.
Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and BILDER.
Charles E. Reuther argued the cause for appellant (Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Hyland, attorneys; Gerald A. Liloia, of counsel; Charles E. Reuther, on the brief and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Anthony D'agostino v. Ricardo Maldonado (068940)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- James Suber v. Chrysler Corporation v. Kontinental Koaches, Inc., A/K/A and D/B/A Kontinental Konversions, Third-Party Chrysler Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.