Legal Opinion

Macomber v. Cottrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1912No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Macomb; McKay, J. Bill by Allen Macomber against George Cottrell and others to set aside a compromise agreement for fraud. From an order overruling a demurrer to complainant’s bill, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This case is now before the court for the second time. It will be found reported at 162 Mich. 91 *372(127 N. W. 402), where we held that the bill was without equity, sustained the demurrer thereto, and entered a decree of dismissal. Later an application was made to amend the decree so as to permit complainant to file an amended bill. A proposed statement of further facts was tendered with the application. Out of an abundance of caution, the court amended its decree permitting the filing of an amended bill without passing upon the sufficiency of the new matter tendered. 162 Mich. 718 (128 N. W.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayor v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API