Brandt v. Luce
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Branch; Knowlen, J. Bill by Harry Brandt and others against Emery G. Luce and others for an injunction, etc. From an order sustaining a demurrer to complainants’ bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In the year 1912 the county of Branch adopted the county road system, pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 283, Public Acts of 1909 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 2173 et seq.). County road commissioners were appointed to act until others should be elected in April, 1913. Those appointed qualified and entered upon the duties of the office. A *186tax of two mills upon each dollar of assessed valuation of property was voted, was spread upon the rolls, has been collected, and is in the treasury of the county. The sum is about $40,000. At various times, from December 31, 1912, to March 18, 1913, the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McManus v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Brassington v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Thomson v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Township of Lowell v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921