State v. Ochoa
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Convicted of two counts of criminal sexual contact of a minor and one count of interference with communications, Defendant appeals. Because we agree with Defendant that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated, we reverse.
ANALYSIS OF A SPEEDY TRIAL CLAIM
{2} “The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right of the accused,” guaranteed by the “Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, [and] applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.” State v. Garza, 2009-NMSC-038, ¶ 10, 146 N.M. 499, 212 P.3d 387; see U.S. Const. amend. VI; N.M.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SpearmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LargoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.