Legal Opinion

State v. Ochoa

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2014No. 34,630; Docket No. 31,243PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} Convicted of two counts of criminal sexual contact of a minor and one count of interference with communications, Defendant appeals. Because we agree with Defendant that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated, we reverse.

ANALYSIS OF A SPEEDY TRIAL CLAIM

{2} “The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right of the accused,” guaranteed by the “Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, [and] applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.” State v. Garza, 2009-NMSC-038, ¶ 10, 146 N.M. 499, 212 P.3d 387; see U.S. Const. amend. VI; N.M.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SpearmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. LargoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. GuruleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API